Why U.S. used vehicles price data is conflicting

America’s secondhand-vehicle market is throwing some economists and auto-industry analysts for a loop. 

Prices for used cars and trucks fell 3 percent in September from the prior month, matching September 2003 as the biggest drop since the 1960s, a Labor Department report showed Thursday. That contributed to a gauge of underlying U.S. inflation, the core consumer price index, coming in below estimates.

But the government data tell a different story from Manheim Consulting’s Used Vehicle Value Index, which set a record for the third straight month in September. Manheim, the largest vehicle re-marketer and auction network in North America, said the rapid shift in consumer demand toward SUVS and crossovers and away from sedans may be contributing to the disconnect.

“This is one of the weirdest CPI reports that I can remember,” Stephen Stanley, chief economist at Amherst Pierpont Securities, wrote in a report Thursday. He called the government’s used-vehicle price figure “entirely at odds with the underlying reality in that market” and cited wholesale-auction data.

Manheim’s index is an indicator of what auto dealers are paying for used-vehicle inventory in the wholesale market. By contrast, SUVs may not be a fully represented contingent of the fixed basket of used vehicles that the government measures, said Zo Rahim, a manager of economics and industry insights at Manheim parent Cox Automotive.

“The used market continues to see share increased in the light-truck mix,” Rahim wrote in an email. “Our mix is much richer and aligned with what sold at auction.”

Another possible reason for the sharp drop in the Labor Department’s gauge is a new methodology implemented in January: The index switched to a one-month change from a three-month average. The transition followed an increase in the sample size of prices, while the average had previously been used to smooth volatility from the smaller sample, according to a fact sheet on the calculations.


Read more >

Leave a Reply