Big changes are afoot for the gig economy. California’s Senate passed a landmark bill on Tuesday night that could make Uber, Lyft, DoorDash, Postmates and other gig economy companies . Gov. Gavin Newsom has said he’ll sign it into law.
The prospective law, AB 5, could upend these gig economy companies, which have businesses hinged on bringing aboard hundreds of thousands of independent contractors whose labor is far cheaper than that of employees. The setup benefits the companies by shifting many costs to the workers. For example, Uber and Lyft drivers supply and maintain their own cars and also pay for their own health care. The drivers also aren’t given benefits, such as sick days or overtime pay.
Uber and Lyft have both said their businesses could be broken if they’re required to reclassify their drivers as employees. The move would bring a new set of costs to the companies — both of which are struggling to become profitable. Uber hadin the past six weeks to control its costs.
When Uber filed to become a publicly traded company, it specifically identified the risk in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. “Our business would be adversely affected if drivers were classified as employees instead of independent contractors,” it wrote.
California sets the stage
What happens in California rarely stays there. By dint of its size, the Golden State often sets legal and regulatory standards for the country. The state is the largest by both population and economic activity, and that size means companies around the world have to meet its often-strict and precedent-setting standards if they want to tap the lucrative market.
In addition to AB 5, the state passed the California Consumer Privacy Act, which sets standards for collecting information online and goes into effect in January. The state’s rules and laws on fuel efficiency, emissions and air quality have affected automakers around the world. And the California Assembly just passed a bill that would allow college athletes to be paid for the use of their likeness.
San Francisco and Oakland passed the earliest laws in the US curbing the use of facial recognition technology, and San Francisco was among the first cities to curb , requiring hosts to be registered with the city.
AB 5 could serve as a first step to broader oversight of the gig economy. Already New York City ensures drivers earn at least $17.22 per hour for each trip they make and has put limits on fleet sizes to prevent congestion. Washington state and Oregon have considered legislation similar to AB 5.
Michael Droke, a labor and employment partner at Dorsey & Whitney, said AB 5 will likely spur other states into action.
“While limited workers to California, other states are likely to enact similar legislation,” Droke said.
Support for AB 5 was evident among ride-hail drivers in California. Thousands of drivers across the state rallied to whip up support for AB 5 as it made its way through the legislature. They protested in front of Uber’s San Francisco headquarters and organized a caravan from Los Angeles to Sacramento. Many met with lawmakers to push for the bill.
“AB 5 is only the beginning,” according to Edan Alva, a ride-hail driver who was involved in AB 5 organizing with the group Gig Workers Rising. He says the momentum for change is building. “Just because someone really needs to work does not mean that their rights as a worker should be stepped all over.”
Uber and Lyft have said the majority of their drivers don’t want to be employees, a status that would change the relationship between the companies and the workers.
The companies have said that if they couldn’t strike a deal on AB 5, they’d take the issue to California voters by sponsoring a ballot initiative in November 2020 that would exempt them from the law. Along with DoorDash, Uber and Lyft have said they’d spend $30 million each to sponsor the initiative.
“We are fully prepared to take this issue to the voters of California to preserve the freedom and access drivers and riders want and need,” Adrian Durbin, a Lyft spokesman, said in an emailed statement.
Originally published Sept. 11.
Update, 2:07 p.m.: Adds attorney comment.